1. Why are
the Gulf States so interested in helping Egypt’s economy after the revolution?
We can sum up the reasons for providing help to Egypt by Gulf
countries in the following:
1. There is a high interdependence between economic performance and
political stability. Egypt economy is
threatened by serious decline due to the fact that the current revolution is
not properly managed by its own forces.
Interruptions in economic activities could lead to negative growth, with
a higher impact on the poor masses, leading to disaffection and more political
instability.
2. The stability of the Arab and particularly the Gulf region
critically depends on the stability of Egypt.
This is because Egypt is the largest country in population, political
prestige and military might. It stands
as a countervailing force vis-à-vis both Israel and Iran. Unstable Egypt could encourage the two forces
to increase their mischief in the Arab region, negatively affecting the stability
of the whole region.
3. Economic deterioration and resulting stability could lead to a
belligerent revolution that could be destructive, spelling over into
neighboring gulf countries.
4. Common cultural ties between the Egyptian and the Gulf people
creates mutual empathy to the extent that one of them would not tolerate the
suffering of the other. In particular,
the common religious beliefs as Muslims command everyone to help the poor in
general and neighbors in particular.
Islamic teachings make it a grave sin to ignore the needs of the poor and dispossessed. However, the religious factor works only at
the personal level, and is reflected on increased aid from non-government institutions.
2.
If not covered in your answer to the first question - do you think
Islamic/sharia-compliance is a motivation for Gulf economic assistance to
Egypt?
3.
What is the most effective way the Gulf states can help Egypt? Currently it's a
mix of loans, gifts (grants) and investments being offered.
1. The most suitable way of providing assistance to Egypt in
particular and developing countries in general is through grants followed by
investment finance. The latter includes:
1.1.
Finance of capital through
partnership (Musharaka and diminishing Musharaka),
1.2.
Finance of working capital
through Profit-and-loss-sharing schemes (PLS, like Mudaraba),
1.3.
Commodity finance through
providing commodities, including productive assets, against deferred payment or
through leasing that ends with title transfer,
1.4.
Commodity finance through
payments of Egyptian products in advance against their future delivery (as in
Salam and Istisna'),
1.5.
BOT finance of
infrastructure projects,
1.6.
Donors’ subscription to
Sukuk issued to finance development projects
2. The worst type of aid provision is through conventional loans. This type of aid involves a great deal of
information asymmetry, leading to serious risks of adverse selection and moral
hazard. This has been the dominant type
of providing finance to developing economies, that has been criticized with
ineffectiveness and often ending with debt crises.
Adding to the above, we must note that Egypt does not need
aid pledges or a mere declaration of development assistance programs. It requires that aid should be passed through
the quickest way and that filters into increased employment and provision of
basic needs. Examples of this are:
No comments:
Post a Comment